Imbalance of Yin-Yang Energy in Modern Organizations and Women’s Psychological Dynamics: Behavioral Analysis Based on 22 Emotional Stages and Strategic Interpersonal Management

意識の深層

Organizational Psychology × Ancient Wisdom

Yin-Yang Energy Imbalance in Modern Organizations
Behavioral Analysis Through the 22 Stages of Emotion

Female Psychological Dynamics & Strategic Interpersonal Management

Redefining Yin-Yang for the Modern Workplace

Yin-Yang philosophy — which explains all phenomena in the universe through two opposing yet complementary energies — is far more than an ancient dualism. It provides an effective analytical framework for modern organizational psychology as well.

☀ Yang (Masculine Energy)

  • Expansion & initiative
  • Logical, direct communication
  • Breaking existing frameworks
  • Creative disruption toward new creation

☽ Yin (Feminine Energy)

  • Receptivity & contraction
  • Empathic, harmonizing communication
  • Nurturing life and relationships
  • Bringing stability through cultivation

In modern society, the divergence between biological sex and psychological disposition has become pronounced. Gender identity disorders — where physical sex and mental self-identification diverge — suggest that the internal distribution of yin-yang energy within an individual is fluid, transcending conventional social stereotypes.

The problem behaviors observed in workplaces — “the veteran gatekeeper” or “the overbearing female leader” — are not expressions of identity diversity. They are products of energy distortion and stagnation.

This article dissects the expression of negative femininity in the workplace using the lens of yin-yang imbalance and Abraham Hicks’ “22 Stages of Emotion,” and presents professional defense and improvement strategies.

Yin-Yang Distortion: Anatomy of Workplace Archetypes

Analyzing workplace troublemakers through the yin-yang framework reveals that they have lost the nurturing power of authentic “yin,” and instead wield a “distorted yin” or “runaway yang” as their weapon.

The Exclusive Veteran (The Gatekeeper Type): Yin at Its Stagnated Extreme

The behavior of veteran employees commonly referred to as “gatekeepers” can be defined as the negative extreme of yin’s quality of “contraction and defense.” Yin’s inherent nature is to preserve harmony and enrich the internal environment — but when distorted, it mutates into the exclusive vector of “territorial dominance” and “hoarding of vested interests.”

These individuals devote all their energy to preventing change in the workplace, working to eliminate younger employees or prominent individuals who bring fresh perspectives. This is the result of yin’s “protective” quality being converted from constructive maintenance into destructive rejection. In this state, logical dialogue (yang) is refused, and subjective emotion combined with relational manipulation (distorted yin) takes priority.

The Leader Who Alternates Between Intimidation & Flattery: Yang Rampage × Yin Regression

A leader who “applies pressure,” “flatters male superiors,” and handles work carelessly exhibits yang and yin energy mixed in an extremely dysfunctional form. The “pressure” she exerts on subordinates is an expression of yang energy’s negative side — “domination and destruction.” Yet her flattering attitude toward male superiors simultaneously reveals a regression into the negative side of femininity: “passive dependence” and “defining the self through others’ approval.”

Rather than pursuing results through actual work performance (constructive yang expansion), this type maintains her position through political maneuvering and impression management.

Table 1 — Healthy vs. Distorted Yin-Yang Energy in the Workplace
Dimension Healthy Yang Healthy Yin Toxic Distortion
Core Vector Expansion, pioneering, reform Stability, receptivity, nurturing Domination or exclusive stagnation
Communication Logical, direct, fair Empathic, mediating, receptive Pressure, flattery, gossip, manipulation
Work Attitude Goal achievement, accountability Environment building, process focus Cutting corners, irresponsibility, credit theft
Effect on Others Stimulates ambition Elevates psychological safety Jealousy, isolation, forced dependence

Mapping Problem Behavior onto Abraham’s 22 Stages of Emotion

The 22 Stages of Emotion classify the vibrational states of human consciousness from Stage 1 (highest) to Stage 22 (lowest). The behaviors of workplace troublemakers map clearly onto the lower tiers of this scale.

15
Blame
Treating work carelessly while attributing mistakes to others; constant criticism
16
Anger
Intimidating subordinates; chronic irritability — transference of frustration onto weaker parties
17
Revenge
Relentlessly cornering a specific person; attempting to force them to quit
18
Hatred
Gossip, strong rejection, clique formation; deep aversion and negation of others
19
Jealousy
Attacking capable, young employees; low self-esteem masked as aggression
20
Insecurity
Flattery and self-preservation; fear of rejection, dependence on external validation
21
Powerlessness
Irresponsibility, apathy, self-deprecation; despair at being unable to change one’s situation
Table 2 — Problem Behaviors Mapped to the 22 Emotional Stages
Behavioral Pattern Emotional Stage Psychological Energy State
Goal achievement, gratitude, love Stage 1 Peak positivity — full empowerment
Work neglect, blame-shifting Stage 15: Blame Abdication of personal power; attacking surroundings
Intimidation, power harassment, outbursts Stage 16: Anger Explosion and transference of frustration
Persistent harassment, entrapment Stage 17: Revenge Destructive retaliatory emotion
Gossip, strong rejection, factionalism Stage 18: Hatred Deep aversion and negation of others
Attacks on capable/young colleagues Stage 19: Jealousy Low self-worth; envy of others
Flattery, ingratiation, self-preservation Stage 20: Insecurity Fear of rejection; dependency
Irresponsibility, apathy, self-deprecation Stage 21: Powerlessness Despair — harbinger of deeper collapse

Female Aggression & the Mechanisms of Manipulation

The aggression seen in female workplace troublemakers differs from male physical or direct aggression — it is characterized by being indirect, concealed, and psychological in nature. Understanding these mechanisms is indispensable for developing appropriate defenses.

Relational Manipulation & the Passivity of “Being Chosen”

Psychological research indicates that female aggression specializes in skillfully manipulating relationships to socially and psychologically isolate targets. Historical and social backgrounds contribute as well: women who have historically secured status by “being chosen by men” intensify same-sex comparisons of “attractiveness and value,” which feeds directly into the logic of jealousy and exclusion.

The leader who “flatters men” while simultaneously “attacking female colleagues” is bringing this passive competitive logic into the workplace. For her, the workplace is not a space for performing work — it is a battlefield for proving her “chosenworthy value” and outmaneuvering competitors (other women).

Key Insight: Manipulators exploit the workplace as a social arena, not a performance stage. Their “wins” are measured in relational currency, not results.

Psychological Domination by the Manipulator

The person who is “careless with work but guards their position through gossip and manipulation” is called a “manipulator” in psychology. They skillfully exploit others’ goodwill and guilt, and manage surrounding impressions to place themselves in an advantageous position.

1
Gaslighting

Making the target doubt themselves — “Am I the one who’s wrong?” — causing them to lose self-confidence through sustained psychological manipulation.

2
The “This Is for Your Own Good” Disguise

Disguising attacks as advice or genuine concern, thereby sealing off the target’s ability to counter or resist.

3
Impression Management (Double-Tongued Strategy)

Playing the role of a capable, obedient subordinate for superiors (especially authoritative male managers) while covertly running a smear campaign against the target behind the scenes.

Restoring Self-Sovereignty: Establishing Psychological Boundaries

Reacting emotionally to toxic female colleagues — or attempting to persuade them — is in most cases counterproductive. This is because doing so drags you down into their low energy state (Stages 15–22). The core of strategic response lies in setting “psychological boundaries” and “energy separation.”

Building Boundaries: The Immigration Officer Metaphor

Visualize your own mind as an “independent nation state,” and recognize yourself as the “immigration officer” who guards it.

🛂

Emotional Quarantine

When anger, pressure, or gossip is directed at you, step back and ask: “Is this worth bringing into my nation?” If not, declare it “rejected” and mentally return it to the sender’s domain.

🔒

Information Distance

Manipulators weaponize personal information. Share nothing private — maintain only task-essential communication, conducted matter-of-factly.

🪨

Grey Rock Method

Respond to provocations with the dull inertia of a grey rock — polite but emotionally featureless. This denies manipulators the reactive “energy” they feed on, redirecting their attention elsewhere.

📋

Evidence Accumulation

Refuse to engage with emotional arguments. Keep all exchanges grounded in numbers, facts, and records. Log inappropriate instructions or statements with timestamps as objective evidence.

Table 3 — Type-Specific Counter-Strategies
Type Primary Behavior Core Psychology (Stage) Action Plan
Jealousy-Type Gatekeeper Ignoring, excluding, snide remarks Jealousy (19) Minimize contact while feigning humility. Build trust through results; let work speak.
Intimidation-Type Leader Yelling, applying pressure Anger (16) Maintain composure. Cowering intensifies attacks. Report facts to higher management.
Flattery-Manipulation Type Flattering men; spreading gossip Insecurity–Powerlessness (20–21) Never reveal you’ve detected her manipulation. Respond with diligent documentation; close off escape routes.
Negligence-Blame Type Abandoning duties, blame-shifting Blame–Powerlessness (15, 21) Formalize task allocation in writing (email). Build a firewall so her failures don’t reach you.

Organizational Health & Personal Energy Management

Female employee conduct issues in the workplace should not be dismissed as individual character flaws — they must be understood as a circulation failure of the organization’s overall yin-yang energy balance.

The Yin-Yang Balance of Excellent Organizations

In outstanding organizations, yang energy (goal achievement, innovation, logic) and yin energy (psychological safety, cultivation, empathy) are in exquisite balance. Workplaces where troublemakers run rampant are almost always skewed toward either “yang rampage driven by results-first ideology” or “yin stagnation rooted in insularity.”

The ultimate strategy for those experiencing harm is to make the conscious effort to maintain their own emotional stage at Stage 7: Contentment or above. Abraham teaches that as long as one dwells in a high vibration — joy, gratitude, freedom — attacks from lower vibrations lose their power to penetrate.
🙏

The Gratitude Game

Reduce the time spent focusing on unpleasant workplace events. Instead, consciously direct attention toward “what went well today” or “who helped me” — even small moments — to elevate your own vibration.

💎

Reinforcing Self-Affirmation

Stop seeking approval from others — especially from distorted evaluators. Define your own worth by yourself. Authentic confidence in your unguarded self becomes your most powerful shield.

Conclusion: Returning to Integrated Nature

Malicious colleagues and overbearing leaders — regardless of their biological sex — are “energy wanderers” who have lost their inner yin-yang balance, trapped in low emotional stages of low self-worth and anxiety.

Their conduct is not an expression of the qualities of “yin” or “yang” as such, but a product of the “shadow” that emerges when those qualities are obstructed.

As the one responding, what is required is not correcting the other person (yang intervention) nor over-empathizing and becoming entangled with them (yin assimilation) — but the exercise of a sophisticated “self-sovereignty”: maintaining a high frequency, identifying the other party’s “stage” with detached clarity, and guarding one’s boundaries uncompromisingly.

In an increasingly diverse modern society, cultivating the insight to see through to the quality of underlying energy and emotional state — without being misled by labels of gender or title — will be an indispensable key to achieving true leadership and self-realization within any organization.